Nolo was born in 1971 as a publisher of self-help legal books. Guided by the motto “law for all,” our attorney authors and editors have been explaining the law to everyday people ever since. Learn more about our history and our editorial standards.
Each article that we publish has been written or reviewed by one of our editors, who together have over 100 years of experience practicing law. We strive to keep our information current as laws change. Learn more about our editorial standards.
If you own a trademark and find that someone's holding it hostage as a domain name until you pay a large sum for it, you might be the victim of cybersquatting. Learn what to do if this happens to you.
"Cybersquatting" is registering, selling, or using a domain name with the intent of profiting from the goodwill of someone else's trademark. In practice, cybersquatting generally involves buying up domain names that use the names of existing businesses for the sole purpose of turning around and selling the names to those businesses.
The practice that's come to be known as cybersquatting originated at a time when most businesses weren't savvy about the commercial opportunities on the internet. Some entrepreneurial souls registered the names of well-known companies as domain names, with the intent of selling the names back to the companies when they finally woke up. Panasonic, Fry's Electronics, Hertz, and Avon were among the "victims" of cybersquatters.
Opportunities for cybersquatters are rapidly diminishing because most businesses now know that nailing down domain names is a high priority.
How do you know if the domain name you want is being used by a cybersquatter? Follow these steps to find out.
As a general rule, you should first check to see if the domain name takes you to a website. You might be dealing with a cybersquatter if the domain name doesn't take you to a functioning website but instead takes you to a site that says either:
The absence of a real site can indicate that the domain name owner's only purpose in buying the name is to sell it back to you at a higher price.
Of course, the absence of a website doesn't always mean the presence of a cybersquatter. There could also be an innocent explanation and the domain name owner could have perfectly legitimate plans to have a website in the future.
If the domain takes you to a functioning website that's comprised primarily of advertisements for products or services related to your trademark, you might also have a case of cybersquatting. For example, suppose your company is well-known for providing audiovisual services. You find a domain using your trademark packed with ads for other companies' audiovisual services. In this case, a cybersquatter is likely operating the site to trade off your company's popularity to sell Google ads to your competitors.
Instead, suppose the domain name takes you to a website that appears functional, has a reasonable relation to the domain name, and doesn't compete with your products or services. In that case, you probably aren't looking at a case of cybersquatting. For example, if your trademark is "Moby Dick" for fine art dealing with whaling, and the website you encounter is for road cleaning machines, you don't have a case of cybersquatting. You might, under certain circumstances, have a case of trademark infringement.
Before jumping to any conclusions, contact the domain name registrant. To find the name and address of a domain name owner, you can use the Whois domain lookup.
Find out why the registrant owns your domain name. If the registrant seems like a cybersquatter, then you could take legal steps to fight the cybersquatter (discussed more below).
However, if the registrant is legitimately using the domain name, consider other options like:
Sometimes, paying the cybersquatter is the best choice. It might be cheaper and quicker than filing a lawsuit or initiating an arbitration hearing.
A victim of cybersquatting in the United States has two options:
Trademark experts consider the ICANN arbitration system to be faster and less expensive than suing under the ACPA, and the procedure doesn't require an attorney.
In 1999, ICANN adopted and began implementing the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDNDRP), a policy for resolution of domain name disputes. This international policy results in an arbitration of the dispute, not litigation.
Under ICANN, you can win against a cybersquatter as long as all of the following are true:
If you (referred to by ICANN as the "complainant") win, the domain name will be canceled or transferred to you. However, financial remedies aren't available under the UDNDRP. Information about initiating a complaint is provided on the ICANN website.
The Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA) authorizes a trademark owner to sue an alleged cybersquatter in federal court and obtain a court order transferring the domain name back to the trademark owner. In some cases, the cybersquatter must pay money damages.
In order to stop a cybersquatter, the trademark owner must prove all of the following:
Defenses to ACPA lawsuits. If the accused cybersquatter demonstrates that they had a reason to register the domain name other than to sell it back to the trademark owner for a profit, then a court will probably allow him to keep the domain name.
For extensive information on cybersquatting, domain names, and changes to trademark statutes, get Trademark: Legal Care for Your Business & Product Name, by Stephen Elias and Richard Stim (Nolo).